Young Students’ Functional Thinking Modes: The Relation Between Recursive Patterning, Covariational Thinking, and Correspondence Relations (2024)

  • 1.

    Blanton, M., Brizuela, B. M., Gardiner, A. M., Sawrey, K., & Newman-Owens, A. (2015). A learning trajectory in 6-year-olds’ thinking about generalizing functional relationships. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(5), 511–558. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.5.0511

  • 2.

    Blanton, M., Stephens, A., Knuth, E., Gardiner, A. M., Isler, I., & Kim, J.-S. (2015). The development of children’s algebraic thinking: The impact of a comprehensive early algebra intervention in third grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 39–87. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.1.0039

  • 3.

    Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2011). Functional thinking as a route into algebra in the elementary grades. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 5–23). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_2

  • 4.

    Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality and Quantity, 36(4), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020909529486

  • 5.

    Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.

  • 6.

    Cañadas, M. C., Brizuela, B. M., & Blanton, M. (2016). Second graders articulating ideas about linear functional relationships. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.10.004

  • 7.

    Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (2007). Early algebra. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 669–705). Information Age.

  • 8.

    Confrey, J., & Smith, E. (1994). Exponential functions, rates of change, and the multiplicative unit. In P. Cobb (Ed.), Learning mathematics: Constructivist and interactionist theories of mathematical development (pp. 31–60). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2057-1_2

  • 9.

    Confrey, J., & Smith, E. (1995). Splitting, covariation, and their role in the development of exponential functions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(1), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/749228

  • 10.

    Cooper, T. J., & Warren, E. (2011). Years 2 to 6 students’ ability to generalise: Models, representations and theory for teaching and learning. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 187–214). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_12

  • 11.

    Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.

  • 12.

    Demetriou, A., & Kyriakides, L. (2006). The functional and developmental organization of cognitive developmental sequences. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 209–242. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X43256

  • 13.

    Doorman, M., Drijvers, P., Gravemeijer, K., Boon, P., & Reed, H. (2013). Design research in mathematics education: The case of an ICT-rich learning arrangement for the concept of function. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research. Part B: Illustrative cases (pp. 425–446). SLO: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.

    See Also
    Integrating variable electricity supply from wind and ... · Integrating variable electricity supply from wind and solar PV into power systems Vorgelegt von Diplom-Physiker ... the - [PDF Document]Illustrative Mathematics hiring Transitional Kindergarten/Prekindergarten Curriculum Specialist in Oro Valley, Arizona, United States | LinkedInIllustrative Mathematics hiring Transitional Kindergarten/Prekindergarten Curriculum Specialist in Oro Valley, Arizona, United States | LinkedInLink Community Charter School hiring 5th Grade MathTeacher in Newark, New Jersey, United States | LinkedIn

  • 14.

    Dubinsky, E., & Harel, G. (1992). The nature of the process conception of function. In E. Dubinsky & G. Harel (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 85–106). Mathematical Association of America.

  • 15.

    Eisenberg, T. (1992). On the development of a sense for functions. In E. Dubinsky & G. Harel (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 153–174). Mathematical Association of America.

  • 16.

    Ellis, A. B. (2011). Algebra in the middle school: Developing functional relationships through quantitative reasoning. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 215–238). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_13

  • 17.

    El Mouhayar, R. (2018). Trends of progression of student level of reasoning and generalization in numerical and figural reasoning approaches in pattern generalization. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9821-8.

  • 18.

    Ferrara, F., & Sinclair, N. (2016). An early algebra approach to pattern generalisation: Actualising the virtual through words, gestures and toilet paper. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9674-3

  • 19.

    Greeno, J. G. (1988). The situated activities of learning and knowing mathematics. In M. Behr, C. Lacampagne, & M. Wheeler (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the PME-NA (pp. 481–521). International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, North American Chapter.

  • 20.

    Jurdak, M. E., & El Mouhayar, R. R. (2014). Trends in the development of student level of reasoning in pattern generalization tasks across grade level. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9494-2

  • 21.

    Kane, M. T. (2016). Validity as the evaluation of the claims based on test scores. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(2), 309–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1156645

  • 22.

    Kieran, C. (2018). Seeking, using, and expressing structure in numbers and numerical operations: A fundamental path to developing early algebraic thinking. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds (pp. 79–105). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68351-5_4

  • 23.

    Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88(3), 767–778. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.3.767

  • 24.

    Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–386. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017

  • 25.

    See Also
    Find Jeopardy Games About illustrative mathematics tasks grade 4

    Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bernarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 65–86). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1732-3_5

  • 26.

    Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Sage.

  • 27.

    Mulligan, J., & Mitchelmore, M. (2009). Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217544

  • 28.

    Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Authors.

  • 29.

    National Council for Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author.

  • 30.

    Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

  • 31.

    Papic, M. M., Mulligan, J. T., & Mitchelmore, M. C. (2011). Assessing the development of preschoolers’ mathematical patterning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(3), 237–269. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.3.0237

  • 32.

    Piaget, J., Grize, J.-B., Szeminska, A., & Bang, V. (1977). Epistemology and psychology of functions. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9321-7

  • 33.

    Radford, L. (2011). Grade 2 students’ non-symbolic algebraic thinking. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 303–322). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_17

  • 34.

    Radford, L. (2018). The emergence of symbolic algebraic thinking in primary school. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds (pp. 3–25). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68351-5_1

  • 35.

    Rivera, F. D. (2010). Visual templates in pattern generalization activity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(3), 297–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9222-0

  • 36.

    Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302715

  • 37.

    Siemon, D., Beswick, K., Brady, K., Clark, J., Faragher, R., & Warren, E. (2011). Teaching mathematics: Foundations to middle years. Oxford University Press.

  • 38.

    Smith, E. (2008). Representational thinking as a framework for introducing functions in the elementary curriculum. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 133–160). Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315097435-6

  • 39.

    Stephens, A. C., Ellis, A. B., Blanton, M., & Brizuela, B. M. (2017). Algebraic thinking in the elementary and middle grades. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 386–420). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • 40.

    Stephens, A. C., Fonger, N., Strachota, S., Isler, I., Blanton, M., Knuth, E., & Gardiner, A. M. (2017). A learning progression for elementary students’ functional thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 19(3), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2017.1328636

  • 41.

    Taherdoost, H. (2016). How to design and create an effective survey/questionnaire; A step by step guide. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(4), 37–41.

  • 42.

    Tanışlı, D. (2011). Functional thinking ways in relation to linear function tables of elementary school students. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30(3), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.08.001

  • 43.

    Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage.

  • 44.

    Tesch, R. (2013). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Routledge.

  • 45.

    Thompson, P. W., & Carlson, M. P. (2017). Variation, covariation, and functions: Foundational ways of thinking mathematically. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 421–456). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • 46.

    Usiskin, Z. (1988). Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables. In A. P. Shulte & A.F. Coxford (Eds.), The ideas of algebra, K12: 1988 yearbook (pp. 8–19). National Council of Mathematics.

  • 47.

    Vollrath, H.-J. (1986). Search strategies as indicators of functional thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17(4), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311326

  • 48.

    Warren, E., & Cooper, T. (2005). Introducing functional thinking in Year 2: A case study of early algebra teaching. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(2), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2005.6.2.5

  • 49.

    Warren, E. A., Cooper, T. J., & Lamb, J. T. (2006). Investigating functional thinking in the elementary classroom: Foundations of early algebraic reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25(3), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2006.09.006

  • 50.

    Wilkie, K. J., & Clarke, D. M. (2016). Developing students’ functional thinking in algebra through different visualisations of a growing pattern’s structure. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0146-y

    • Young Students’ Functional Thinking Modes: The Relation Between Recursive Patterning, Covariational Thinking, and Correspondence Relations (2024)

    References

    Top Articles
    Weeknight Meal Ideas: 15 Easy Japanese Recipes
    Creamed Brussels Sprouts Recipe – Oma's Rosenkohl Rezept
    Text Verification Online
    Her Triplet Alphas Chapter 32
    U.S. state and local laser laws and regulations
    [1.12.2] Industrial Foregoing for Newbies
    ITC+ air-cooled chiller 100L
    NissanConnect | Entdecken Sie die Nissan Apps
    Frostbite Blaster
    Who Is Lainey Wilson's Boyfriend? All About Devlin 'Duck' Hodges
    Pollen Count Los Altos
    Dell FHD+-TrueLife-LCD (13,0") mit Touchfunktion | Dell Deutschland
    Latest Posts
    50 Egg Yolk Recipes for Leftover Egg Yolks | NeighborFood
    Easy Turmeric Milk Recipe
    Article information

    Author: Lilliana Bartoletti

    Last Updated:

    Views: 6776

    Rating: 4.2 / 5 (53 voted)

    Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Lilliana Bartoletti

    Birthday: 1999-11-18

    Address: 58866 Tricia Spurs, North Melvinberg, HI 91346-3774

    Phone: +50616620367928

    Job: Real-Estate Liaison

    Hobby: Graffiti, Astronomy, Handball, Magic, Origami, Fashion, Foreign language learning

    Introduction: My name is Lilliana Bartoletti, I am a adventurous, pleasant, shiny, beautiful, handsome, zealous, tasty person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.